Covets: The Prince of Mist

On princes, mist, and double le sighs:

Whoa, whoa whoa.  I know I’ve been off the radar and all but when did Carlos Ruiz Zafon come out with a new book?  I wasn’t expecting this at all.  Especially since I waited almost six years (or something that felt like six years) for Zafon to come out with The Angel’s Game after I read and loved The Shadow of the Wind. I figured I’d have to wait just as long for Zafon’s third book so I, er… haven’t even read The Angel’s Game yet.  Now I’m behind.  Double le sigh.

The Prince of Mist is a little different from the other two in that it’s classified as a young adult novel. There also seems to be more overt supernatural elements in this book than in his other two.  The book description on Amazon reads:

It’s war time, and the Carver family decides to leave the capital where they live and move to a small coastal village where they’ve recently bought a home. But from the minute they cross the threshold, strange things begin to happen. In that mysterious house still lurks the spirit of Jacob, the previous owners’ son, who died by drowning.

With the help of their new friend Roland, Max and Alicia Carver begin to explore the strange circumstances of that death and discover the existence of a mysterious being called the Prince of Mist–a diabolical character who has returned from the shadows to collect on a debt from the past. Soon the three friends find themselves caught up in an adventure of sunken ships and an enchanted stone garden–an adventure that will change their lives forever.

Oh, and did I mention there’s a trailer?

You need to a flashplayer enabled browser to view this YouTube video

…….

Needless to say, I’ve already requested a copy from the library.  The library hasn’t received their own ordered copies yet, which means I have some time to read my way through The Angel’s Game.  Sweet.

Popularity: 26% [?]

Teasing on Thursday & A Lootless Library Week

On brothers, latrines, closing out the city, starting the big machine, and uncovering the hidden brain:

No excuses for my two-day silence.  Onwards and upwards, folks!  Besides, I’m feeling pretty good since I just polished off China Mieville’s The City & The City.  I’ll say only that I liked it, because I’ve found that the less I say about a book before I’ve posted my post-read rambles, the most likely I am to actually to post my post-read rambles. So tonight is for catching up on the memes I missed this week, the first of which occurred on Tuesday: Teaser Tuesdays!

The following paragraph is taken from Brothers by Yu Hua:

Baldy Li had never met his birth father, since on the day he was born his father left his earth in a fit of stink.  His mother told him that his father had drowned, but Baldy Li asked, “How? Did he drown in the stream, in the pond, or in a well?”  His mother didn’t respond.  It was only later, after Baldy Li had been caught peeping and had become stinkingly notorious throughout Liu Town – only then did he learn that he really was another rotten melon off the same damn vine as his father.  And it was only then that he learned that his father had also been peeping at women’s butts in a latrine when he accidentally fell into the cesspool and drowned. – page 3

Brothers is the epic and ribald story of Baldi Li who navigates the changing world of China from the Cultural Revolution to reform and globalization.  According to the back of the book, this novel is hugely popular in China despite – or perhaps, because of – its very irreverent take on Chinese cultural.  This may have had something to do with why it was short-listed for the Man Asian Literary Prize and the winner of the Prix Courrier International Winner.  When I saw Brothers in the bookstore I was instantly drawn to it.  It’s been a long while since I’ve read a book set in China.  In fact, I can’t remember the last book I read set in China so this will be a real treat to read once I get around to it.

Now on to the second meme I missed this week, Library Loot!  Well, unfortunately there isn’t very much to report here since I haven’t made any trips to the library within the last week.  Given the fact that I already have more than a few books I’m trying to speed through before the due date, I guess that shouldn’t be much of a surprise.  Now that I’ve wrapped up The City & The City, I need to get cracking on Big Machine by Victor LaValle and The Hidden Brain: How our Unconscious Minds Elect Presidents, Control Markets, Wage Wars, and Save Our Lives by Shankar Vadantam, both of which are due back in the library in the next five – yes, five – days.  I swear this library thing is going to give me a heart attack.

Before I sign off, I should say that though I didn’t make it to the library this week, I did pick a free copy of Linchpin: Are You Indespensable? by Seth Grodin yesterday.  My company gave it out to everyone at an office-wide event yesterday.  I’ve seen this book around and I gotta say I was really happy when I heard they were giving out copies to everyone.  Of course, when am I ever not happy when someone’s giving away free books?  In any case, since there are some things that I’d like to change about my professional life at the moment, it looks like this may have arrived at just the right time.

And that’s all, folks.  I have some serious speed-reading I need to get back to.  Happy reading, all.

* Teaser Tuesdays is a weekly meme hosted by Miz B at Should Be Reading

* Library Loot is a weekly meme co-hosted by Eva and A Striped Armchair and Marg at Adventures of an Intrepid Reader.

Popularity: 8% [?]

What Am I Reading? One Too Many Books.

On reading too many books, a bit of a conundrum, two cities, and a big machine:

What am I reading?  One too many books, that’s what.  I need help!  One of my goals this year was to cut down on the number of books I read at a single time.  I was doing pretty well too.  Granted, I went from reading two books at a time, to three, and now to four – but four was the absolute limit, I tell ya.  Any more than four and I know where this road ends.  It ends with my reading ten plus books at one time and hardly ever finishing any of them.  So, no more.

Only now I have a bit of conundrum.  I’ m currently reading:

The Forever War by Dexter Filkins.  I’ve already gushed about it here, and it’s still just as good.

Let the Great World Spin by Colum McCann.  I haven’t gushed about this one yet, but everyone else has, and so far it’s lived up to the hype.  This novel is ridiculously well written.  I love it when authors make poetry out of seemingly simply constructed sentences and that is exactly what McCann does.  The language is gorgeous and lush at the same time that it’s economical.  I love it.

The Book of Night Women by Marlon James.  I’ve seen this book around a while, but when I first saw it, I didn’t really have much of an inclination to read it.  I’m thanking my lucky stars I checked this one out from the library.  This book is unlike anything I’ve read in a very long time.  It’s no wonder this one made it so far into the Tournament of Books.  The dialogue in which this novel is written – the Jamaican English of seventeenth century slaves – is feat of wonder.  It’s consistently unique yet authentic, and very, very impressive.

Then there are the two books which have been battling it out for the fourth spot for the past week.  To read or not to read, that is the question at hand.  Both of them are library books, which is exactly the problem, because you know, due dates and all.  A few weeks ago, as you may recall, I checked out China Mieville’s The City & The City.  I started read that as my fourth book, because I’d been wanting to read some Mieville for a while.  In fact, last year I almost bought Un Lun Dun, about which I’d heard very good things.

I went for The City & The City instead, because it seemed I’d been hearing a lot of good things about it lately, plus it won the British Science Fiction Association award, and it recently made the shortlist for the Nebula awards.  What can I say?  I’m a sucker for a good award-winning novel, especially one with a premise as interesting as The City & The City.  The City & The City is essentially a murder mystery set in a city that occupies the same space as another, rival city.  The two cities share the same land, but they exist on two separate planes even though residents of one city can technically see the residents of the other city.  It’s definitely unique, but I’ll be darned if it doesn’t work.

I was reading The City & The City at a pretty happy clip until I had the bright idea to put in a hold request for Victor LaValle’s Big Machine. I’d first head about this on the Tournament of Books, too.  This book went pretty far in the the competition as well.  In fact, it got knocked out of the competition by none other than The Book of Night Women. From what I remember though, it was a pretty close call.  In any case, when I put in a hold request at the library for a copy, I didn’t think it would arrive as soon as it did.  I didn’t have much time to finish off one of my other current reads before I had to pick this one up at the library.  It seems now that the word is out that Big Machine is a book worth reading, other people have requested this at the library.  What this means for me is that I either read it before the due date, return it unread, or accrue .25 cents per day in overdue fines.  (Sidenote:  Overdue fines are .25 cents a day now?!  I mean, really?  When did this become standard policy?  Not to sound like a golden oldie or anything, but I remember when overdue fines were more like nickel or dime a day.  I understand libraries need to make their revenue and patrons – including myself – really should return books on time, but a quarter? Sheez louise.)

So what’s a girl to do?  Does she drop The City & The City, a book which she’s very much enjoying, for one with a due much more urgent?  Or does she start on the slippery slope of doom and read five books at one time?  I suppose I could drop either The Forever War or Let the Great World Spin, since I own both of those books, but I don’t want to stop in the middle of reading those either.  It seems like the thing to do is to engage in a little speed reading.  I guess I better get cracking!  Sigh. I complain, but I love having too many great things to read.  But…ahem, if you have any alternative solutions to my speed reading, I’m open to hearing them. ;)

Happy reading all.

*It’s Monday, What Are You Reading? is a weekly meme hosted by BookJourney.

P.S.  The spammers have been out in full force lately, so unfortunately I’ve had to turn on my comment moderation.  It sucks, I know.  Blame it on the spambots.

Popularity: 10% [?]

When You Reach Me: Post-Read Rambles

On the everyday and the fantastic:

This book is now five days overdue at the library.  Normally, I would feel really bad about that, especially since other patrons have requested it and are waiting for it as we speak, but I am so happy that I didn’t return Rebecca Stead’s When You Reach Me before I had a chance to read it.  Good lord, what a wonderful book.  I have no words for how much I enjoyed this novel, only that I’m thanking my lucky stars When You Reach Me wasn’t published four years ago when I thought YA literature couldn’t possibly suit my adult literary taste.  How wrong I was.

One of my favorite kinds of novels are those that mix the everyday with the fantastic, and what I really enjoy is when novels use the fantastic not just for its inherent appeal, but to reveal how profound the everyday really is.  When You Reach Me is one of those books.  When You Reach Me is the story of Miranda, a twelve-year old girl who’s learned how to expertly navigate the streets of her New York neighborhood with her best friend Sal.  Avoid crazy laughing man on the corner.  Check.  Always have key out before you get to the door. Double check.  Miranda’s life seems to be a normal one until something terrible and momentous happens to her best friend, and suddenly Miranda is forced to think about the true meaning of friendship, and what it means to be a thoughtful and generous person.

Oh, but it’s about so much more than that, and I’m making it sound all blah and cliche, aren’t I?  How do I explain that it’s also about understanding that people are complicated, that you might have more in common with someone you despise or less in common with someone you find generally agreeable.  It’s about navigating the tumultuous waves of friendship; it’s about the embarrassment of your first crush and the excitement of your first kiss; it’s about the moment at which we realize our parents can dream and be disappointed too.  It’s about boring music assemblies (I remember those!), and first jobs, and quiz shows, and A Wrinkle in Time by Madeleine L’Engle.

And, I haven’t even gotten to the fantastic part yet. Somewhere in the middle of all of this Miranda begins receiving mysterious notes from someone who knows more than anyone could possibly know about Miranda’s life.  The first letter reads (don’t worry – this doesn’t give away anything of the plot):

M,

This is hard.  Harder than I expected, even with your help.  But I have been practicing, and my preparations go well.  I am coming to save your friend’s life, and my own.

I ask two favors.

First, you must write me a letter.

Second, please remember to mention the location of your house key.

The trip is a difficult one.  I will not be myself when I reach you.

And so begins the mystery of When You Reach Me.  The mystery at the heart of this novel – who is sending the letters? Why are they sending the letters? How do they know so much about Miranda’s life? – is what makes this great novel unforgettable.  No wonder it won the Newbery Medal.  As far as I’m concerned, it deserves many more.  And I’ll tell you another thing, I really need to read A Wrinkle in Time.

Sigh.  So now that I’m finished, I guess this means I have to be a good library patron and return When You Reach Me to the library now.  Naturally, I’m already saving up cash and space to add a copy to my personal library.  Highly recommended.

Happy reading, all.

When You Reach Me by Rebecca Stead
Wendy Lamb Books / July 2009
$15.99 / 199 pages

Popularity: 11% [?]

Library Loot: April 14 – 21, 2010

On crappy internet service and a late library loot:

Yes, I know I’m a day late (as per usual), but my internet wasn’t working last night, and rather than give myself gray hairs cursing Time Warner’s crappy service, I decided to shrug my shoulders and curl up with one of my very good books.  Today’s Library Loot is very small compared with last week’s, but then – *cough, cough* – I still have at least half the books from last week’s Library Loot still checked out, so my library pile is still pretty towering.

But, I digress!  This week’s Library Loot:

Both Ways is the Only Way I Want It by Mailey Meloy.  First lines: “Chet Moran grew up in Logan, Montana, at a time when kids weren’t supposed to get polio anymore.  In Logan, they still did, and he had it before he was two.  He recovered, but his right hip never fit in the socket, and his mother always thought he would die young.  When he was fourteen, he started riding spoiled and unbroke horses, to prove to her that he was invincible.  They bucked and kicked and piled up on him, again and again.  He developed a theory that horses didn’t kick or shy because they were wild; they kicked and shied because for millions of years they’d had the instinct to move fast or be lion meat.”

War Dances by Sherman Alexie.  Excerpt: “Back in college, when I was first learning how to edit film—how to construct a scene—my professor, Mr. Baron, said to me, ‘You don’t have to show people using a door to walk into a room. If people are already in the room, the audience will understand that they didn’t crawl through a window or drop from the ceiling or just materialize. The audience understands that a door has been used—the eyes and mind will make the connection—so you can just skip the door.’”

Lit: A Memoir by Mary Karr.  Excerpt:  “For the first time in front of me, he drew a pint bottle from under his seat. He put the upended lid in the ashtray, and before he handed the bottle over, he drew out a corner of his shirttail to wipe the top with, saying, Want a swig?  As a kid sitting on the bar, I’d sipped beer through the salted tri- angle of his aluminum can, but Daddy had so long and adamantly denied drinking every day that Mother had long since stopped asking. And he’d sure as hell never handed me any hard liquor.”

I’ve been dying to read Both Ways is the Only Way I Want It ever since I heard about it some time last year.  I knew that I wanted to read it even before I knew what it was it about simply because its title spoke to me.  Sometimes you just know from a book’s title that it’s something that’s going to speak to you as a reader.  Meloy’s collection of short stories is one of those books.  I read the first story on the subway on my way home from the library and it was everything I expected it would be – absolutely wonderful.  The story of a cowboy falling in love for the first time was simply told, but packed a punch.  No wonder this book was on a number of award shortlists.

War Dances will be my first Sherman Alexie book.  Umm, do I need to tell you how excited I am?  I am truly hoping that this will be the beginning of a beautiful relationship.  Of course, I’m almost sure it will be given how many of you have raved about Alexie’s other books.  And finally, I was extremely surprised to see Mary Karr’s Lit just sitting on the shelf yesterday.  Earlier in the year, when I thought about placing this book on hold, I believe there were something like 400 people who were waiting on 12 copies to be returned.  I figured I’d be waiting for ages to get a copy so I didn’t even bother adding my name to the list.  But there it was yesterday, just sitting there all unassuming-like. Needless to say, I scooped it up.

Finally, I’d like to say a few parting words for Jasper Fforde’s Shades of Grey, which I returned to the library unfinished.  I wish I could say I returned it because it was due, but unfortunately that wasn’t the case.  Honestly, I just couldn’t get into it.  I tried.  I did.  I love Fforde after all, and I know a couple of you told me that the book picks up, but I just didn’t find the story very compelling nor did I really care for the characters all that much.  If I didn’t have a ton of other more compelling stuff to read, I may have stuck with it, but as it is, that just isn’t the case.  It looks like this is going to be a series, so maybe I’ll come back to it later.  Anything’s possible.

So, tell me folks, have you read any of these?  Thoughts?  Comments?

* Library Loot is a weekly meme co-hosted by Eva at A Striped Armchair and Marg at the Adventures of an Intrepid Reader.

Happy reading, all.

Popularity: 10% [?]

Teaser Tuesdays: There Once Lived a Woman…

On scary fairy tales and once upon a time:

Today’s teaser is taken from Ludmilla Petrushevskaya’s collection of short stories, There Once Lived a Woman Who Tried to Kill Her Neighbor’s Baby: Scary Fairy Tales.

The Miracle:”

There once lived a woman whose son hanged himself.

Which is to say, when she returned home from the night shift one morning, her boy was lying on the floor next to an overturned stool underneath a length of thin synthetic rope.

He was unconscious, but his heart still beat faintly, and so the paramedic who came with the ambulance suggested that her son wasn’t really trying to hang himself.

Even though there was a note on the table: “Mom, I’m sorry.  I love you.”

And it was only when she’d returned home from the hospital, having held her son’s hand as they rode in the ambulance, and then with him into the hospital as he lay on a stretcher, right up to the doors of the intensive care unit,  where she finally had to let him go – only upon returning home did she discover that the wool sock in which she kept her savings was empty. — page 61

There Once Lived a Woman was voted as one of New York Magazine’s Ten Best Books of the Year and as one of NPR’s Five Best Works of Foreign Fiction.  Another, longer excerpt can be found here.

This has been sitting on my TBR shelf for little over month.  Unfortunately, I don’t have time to participate in this year’s Once Upon a Time IV challenge, but if I were participating, I’d definitely be reading this.

Have you read this?  What did you think of it?

Teaser Tuesdays is hosed by Miz B at Should Be Reading.

Popularity: 8% [?]

At the Movies: No One Knows About Persian Cats

I don’t usually talk about movies here on BiblioAddict, but this looks very interesting:

That comment about 50 cent and Madonna is priceless.  I can’t wait until this comes to a theater near me.  This looks like something I’d read much less watch.

Popularity: 9% [?]

Sunday Salon: The “Other” Pulitzer Prizes

On the Pulizer Prize for journalism, tainted justice, doctors playing God, and a childcare program gone horribly wrong:

So early last week, the winners of the 2010 Pulitzer Prize were announced.  True to form, I paid pretty close attention to the Letter, Drama, and Music category in which Tinkers by Paul Harding (Bellevue Literary Press) won the prize for fiction; Lords of Finance: The Bankers Who Broke the World by Liaquat Ahamed (The Penguin Press)won for history; The First Tycoon: The Epic Life of Cornelius Vanderbilt by T.J. Stiles (Alfred A. Knopf) won for biography; Versed by Rae Armantrout (Wesleyan University Press) won for poetry; and The Dead Hand: The Untold Story of the Cold War Arms Race and Its Dangerous Legacy by David E. Hoffman (Doubleday) won for general nonfiction.

I tend to have fairly mixed feelings about the fiction winners of the Pulitzer.  On the one hand, I’m instantly interested in whatever books win the Pulitzer because I expect that any book which receives such a prestigious prize must be superbly written.  On the other hand, my experiences with actually reading Pulitzer Prize-winning books has been decidedly mixed.  I absolutely loved Gilead by Marianne Robinson, which won the prize in 2005.  In fact, it’s one of my top ten favorite books.  Yet, while I did think that Olive Kitteridge by Elizabeth Strout (2009) was very well written, I really wasn’t all that impressed.  It sounds silly, but my largest complaint was that I found it uniformly depressing.

For the past couple of years though, I’ve been paying closer attention to the other Pulitzer category: journalism.  In fact, of the two categories, it’s now my favorite by far.  I know that several blogs have highlighted and discussed the winners in the Letter, Drama, and Music category so I thought I’d take a moment to highlight some of the articles which won the Pulitzer in journalism.  The writing is uniformly superb, most of them are free and available to read on the web (all links provided are to the respective articles), and many of them highlight topics and events you may have missed in the 24 hour/365 day news cycle of last year.  I know I did.

1.  Investigative Reporting.  This is definitely my favorite journalism subcategory.  This year’s prize was awarded to two different newspapers.  Barbara Laker and Wendy Ruderman of the Philadelphia Daily News received the prize for a series of articles called “Tainted Justice” which “exposed a rogue police narcotics squad, resulting in an FBI probe and the review of hundreds of criminal cases tainted by the scandal.”  I haven’t had a chance to read the entire series, but what I have read sounds like something that might happened in an episode of “The Wire.”  Narcotics officers lied about drug deals to raid people’s homes, one woman claims that she was sexually assaulted during such a raid, and store owners have charged that narcotics officers who raided their businesses stole money and merchandise, among other things.

The second prize for this subcategory went to Sheri Fink at ProPublica (in collaboration with New York Times Magazine) for “The Deadly Choice at Memorial” about “the urgent life-and-death decisions made by one hospital’s exhausted doctors when they were cut off by the floodwaters of Hurricane Katrina.”  I strongly recommend that you read this story if you have the time.  I don’t know how I missed this story last year.  Fink chronicles how, days after being stranded with sick and dying patients in a New Orleans hospital after Katrina, doctors and nurses allegedly euthanized over two dozen patients after evacuating the rest by helicopter.  The article raises some very important questions about the responsibility doctors have towards their patients in a disaster, and when and if doctors should take it upon themselves to decide that a patient is not worth the expenditure of limited resources.

2.  Local Reporting.  This award went to Raquel Rutledge of the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel for “Cashing in on Kids,” a series of stories on “the fraud and abuse in a child-care program for low-wage working parents that fleeced taxpayers and imperiled children, resulting in a state and federal crackdown on providers.”  This is an incredible story of how a tax-funded program meant to help low-wage parents afford childcare was abused by providers and recipients.  One childcare provider lived in a million dollar house with an indoor pool and basketball court – all paid with fradulently-gained taxpayer money – while another woman who had opened a day care center had ties to a local mob family.  And then there’s the part of the story that really burns: thousands of children were being kept out kindergarden by their parents who then enrolled them with friends or relatives who provided child care; the parents would then receive a kickback on the money the government sent to the providers.  This is another series that’s well worth reading.

3.  International Reporting.  Anthony Shadid of The Washington Post won this award for “his rich, beautifully written series on Iraq as the United States departs and its people and leaders struggle to deal with the legacy of war and to shape the nation’s future.”  I haven’t started reading this series yet, because I think it would be great to read after I’ve finished reading The Forever War by Dexter Filkins, which is also about the American occupation of Afghanistan and Iraq.  Shadid’s series sounds like it would be would be a great epologue to Filkins’ book.  I’m sure the series is a wonderful read which highlights the complexities with withdrawing American forces from Iraq.

All of these articles are well worth your time, and they emphasize how important journalism continues to be even today when newspapers are shedding reporters and cutting sections.  I am very grateful that prizes like the Pulitzer continue to remind us that there are reporters who are doing amazing things and telling important stories.  The prize for 2010 was just announced last week and I already can’t wait to see what articles will win the award next year.

Happy reading, all.

Popularity: 11% [?]

Library Loot: April 14-20, 2010

On library loots and too many books to read:

It appears that today is library loot day, and boy do I have a mountain for you.  I may not have been blogging much in that last month or so, but I’ve spent a lot of quality time in the library checking out books I can’t possibly find the time to read.  So, without further ado, my list of books which the New York Public Library has so kindly let me borrow:

Dear American Airlines by Jonathan Miles.  First lines:  ”My name is Benjamin R. Ford and I am writing to request a refund in the amount of $392.68.  But, no, scratch that: Request is too mincy & polite, I think, too officious & Britishy, a word that walks along the page with the ramrod straighteness of someone trying to balance a walnut on his upper ass cheeks.  Yet what am I saying?  Words don’t have ass cheeks!  Dear American Airlines, I am rather demanding a refund in the amount of $392.68.  Demanding, demanding, demanding.”

When You Reach Me by Rebecca Stead.  First lines:  ”So Mom got the postcard today.  It says Congratulations in big curly letters, and at the very top is the address of Studio TV-15 on West 58th Street.  After three years of trying, she has actually made it.  She’s going to be a contestant on The $20,000 Pyramid, which is hosted by Dick Clark….  And then there’s the due date she’s supposed to show up, scrawled in blue pen on a line at the bottom of the card: April 27, 1979.  Just like you said.”

The Making of African American: The Four Great Migrations by Ira Berlin.  First lines: “More than any other single event, the Middle Passage – the transit from Africa to America – has come to epitomize the experience of people of African descent throughout the Atlantic world.  The nightmarish weeks and sometimes months locked in the holds of stinking ships speak to the traumatic loss of freedom, the degradation of enslavement, and the long years of bondage that followed.  But the Middle Passage also represent the will of black people to survive, the determination not to be dehumanized by dehumanizing circumstances, and the confidence that freedom would eventually be theirs and that they – or at least their posterity – would take their rightful place as a people among peoples.”

Nobody Move by Denis Johnson.  First lines:  ”Jimmy Luntz has never been to war, but this was the sensation, he was sure of that – eighteen guys in a room, Rob, the director, sending them out – eighteen guys shoulder to shoulder, moving out on the orders of their leader to do what they’ve been training day and night to do.  Waiting silently in darkness behind the heavy curtain while on the other side of it the MC tells a stale joke, and then – “THE ALHAMBRA CALIFORNIA BEACH-COMBER CHORDSMEN!” – and they were smiling at hot lights, doing their two numbers.”

Family Properties: Race, Real Estate, and the Exploitation of Black Urban American by Beryl Satter.  First lines:  ”Growing up in Lawndale, children learned the word gang as soon as they learned to talk, my father wrote of his West Side home in the 1920s.  ”The neighborhood taught them little cultural.  There was more of a constant fight so as not to be afraid to be outside the house.”  In years to come, many would bemoan the transformation of a middle-class have to a rough working-class ghetto, but in truth Lawndale was never the respectable enclave whose loss they lamented.”

Stitches by David Small.  First lines:  ”I was six.  Detroit.  Mama had her little cough. Knh! Once or twice, some quiet sobbing, out of sight… or the slamming of kitchen cupboard doors.  whap! Whap! WHAP! That was her language.  The mere moving of her fork a half-inch to the right spelled dread at the dinner table.  Her furious, silent withdrawals could last for days, even weeks at time.  Because she never spoke her mind, we never knew what this was all about.  We two boys didn’t, at any rate.” (note: this is a graphic novel, so at least half of the “exposition” is missing.)

The Anthologist by Nicholson Barker.  First lines: “Hello, this is Paul Chowder, and I’m going to try to tell you everything I know.  Well, not everything I know, because a lot of what I know, you know.  But everything I know about poetry.  All my tips and tricks and woes and worries are going to come tumbling out before you.  I’m going to divulge them.  What a juicy word that is, ‘divulge.’  Truth opening its petals.  Truth smells like Chinese food and sweat.”

The Education of a British-Protected Child: Essays by Chinua Achebe.  First lines:  ”The title I have chosen for those reflections may not be immediately clear to everybody and , although already rather long, may call for a little explanation or elaboration from me.  But before I get to that, I want to deal with something which gives me even more urgent cause for worry – its content.  I hope my readers are not expecting to encounter the work of a scholar.  I had to remind myself, when I was invited to give this address, that if they think you are a scholar, it must mean you are a scholar of sorts.  I say this “up front,” as Americans would put it, to establish the truth quite early and quite clearly in case somehow a mistake has been made.”

And the following two books are what I picked up on the way home from work today:

The City & The City by China Mieville.  First lines: “I could not see the street or much of the estate.  We were enclosed by dirt-colored blocks, from windows out of which leaned vested men and women with morning hair and mugs of drink, eating breakfast and watching us.  This open ground between the building had once been sculpted.  It pitched like a golf course – a child’s mimicking of geography.  Maybe they had been going to wood it and put in a pond.  There was a copse but the saplings were dead.”

The Hidden Brain: How Our Unconstitutional Minds Elect Presidents, Control Market, Wage Wars, and Save Our Lives by Shankar Vedantam.  First lines: “In the Spring of 2004, The Washington Post assigned me to track Ralph Nader in New England as he campaigned for president.  When I got to Boston, several of Nader’s own aides, mindful of the consumer advocate’s role as spoiler in the disputed 2000 election between George Bush and Al Gore, told me they were going to vote against him.  Since Nadar’s campaign was going nowhere, I took a break from the political story and called a local psychologist I’d heard about.”

You know, now that it’s listed out like that, it doesn’t look bad at all.  It looks almost… manageable. I’m almost positive that I won’t be able to complete all of these before the due date (I also checked out The Big Machine by Victor LaValle, but I didn’t get to read it before the due date, and now I have to return it since it’s on hold, which makes me sad), but a girl can dream, right?

** Library Loot is a weekly meme hosted by Eva at A Striped Armchair and Marge at The Adventures of An Intrepid Reader.

Happy reading all.

Popularity: 11% [?]

The Forever War: Hope and Sorrow

On the never-ending war and a correspondent with heart:

A few days ago, I started reading Dexter Filkins’ The Forever War.  I can tell already that this is going to be one of those books that shame me for letting it sit on my unread shelf for so long.  Superficially, The Forever War is about Afghanistan and Iraq before and after the U.S. invasions.  What makes this book so phenomenal is that it isn’t about war so much as it is about people.  When the mainstream media covers wars, I think they often reduce the people affected to mere numbers and euphemisms: “civilians” and “casualities.”  These numbers and euphemisms make it easy for those thousands of miles removed to forget that Iraq and Afghanistan are populated with living, breathing, feeling human beings.  They have brothers and sisters, mothers and fathers, daughters and sons; they laugh, they cry, they forgive, they are wise, and sometimes they do or say things which they later regret.

That’s one of the many things I’m enjoying – if “enjoying” is a proper descriptor for a book that is both heartbreaking and enlightening –  about The Forever War: it’s compassion and heart.  A book, which I’ve been meaning to read if only because it’s title stuck with me as a sweet but poignant bit of truth, came out a few years ago.  It was called Listening is an Act of Love. And so it is, I’ve found.  And, I think, so has Dexter Filkins.  The events Filkins documents in his book are, of course, from his point of view.  But in the beginning of Chapter 4: “Land of Hope and Sorrow,” Filkins writes:

I’d be talking to one of the Iraqis – about the situation, say, or about their lives, anything – when the conversation would take a turn.  Just like that, without warning.  And if I didn’t try to steer the conversation back to where I’d started, if I just listened, they would tell me everything.

They tell him the story of their lives, the shape of their sorrow, and the depth of their hope for better times.  In one case, out of nowhere, an Iraqi school principal tells him how he learned his brother had been murdered by Sadaam’s secret police.  After the principal, Yacob Yusef, had learned his brother was missing, he tells Filkins,

“Three weeks later, I got a phone call,” Yusef said.  ”I was taking my dinner.  There was a man on the other end, a government official.  He said, ‘Are you Yacob?’  Yes, I told him.  And he said, ‘Come and get the body of your executed brother.’

“You see, someone had written that Saadi [the brother] was doing suspicious activities.  It was nonsense, of course, but….” And he shrugged.

“So I drove to Kut, a two-hour drive from Baghdad, and I went to the state security building,” Yusef said.  ”And Saadi’s body was there, in the back of a refrigerated truck used to distribute agriculture products.  The man who I had talked to on the phone was there, and he said to me, ‘You are very lucky.  Most people, they never get a body.  You should be very grateful to us.’  He waited for me to thank him.  So I thanked him.

“And then this man said to me, ‘I cannot release your brother’s body just yet.’ Why?  I asked the man.  And he said to me, ‘Because you must pay for the bullets that we used to kill him.”

By this time, Yusef’s formal demeanor had collapsed and his cheeks were covered with tears.

“Two bullets they used to kill Saadi.  Two bullets.  And I paid for them.  One hundred fifty dinars.  And this man gave me a receipt.  ’Here is the receipt for the bullets used for the execution of your brother.’”

Iraq was filled with people like Yacob Yusef.  There weren’t survivors as much as they were leftovers.  The ruined byproducts of terrible times…

There are many more stories like Yusef’s throughout The Forever War, and as much as it breaks my heart to know that things like that have happened and continue to happen to people, it’s somewhat comforting to know that at least someone listened to their stories, that someone cared enough to write that down.  They won’t be forgotten and they won’t be ignored.  Listening is indeed an act of love.

I’m only a quarter of the way through Filkins’ The Forever War but I can already say without a doubt that it is going to be one of the most important and unforgettable books I’ll read all year.  The New York Times named it is as the best book of 2008.  I am not surprsed.  Not at all.

Popularity: 11% [?]